Project STAR GATE return on investment huge for Americans

By Steve Hammons

(This article also appears on American Chronicle.)

As we look for ways to make more intelligent choices about defense expenditures and trim wasteful and inefficient spending, the joint-service and joint-agency funding of Project STAR GATE might serve as an example of obtaining tremendous return on investment from defense dollars.

From the initial research phases to implementation of operational activities, several code names were given to this secret project on human consciousness. It was begun the mid-1970s and continued through the mid-1990s. (Some researchers say the efforts may have continued under even greater security.)

Information about this program publicly surfaced in 1995 and entered into public awareness.

What was it and how did it get started? In response to robust research on extrasensory perception (ESP) or “anomalous cognition” in the Soviet Union, U.S. intelligence initially wanted to determine that the Soviets were wasting their time and money on “psychic spying” and other research into human consciousness.

To the initial dismay of some CIA officers, U.S. researchers were surprised to learn that the Soviets were on to something very significant. As a result, the small secret program that later came to be known as Project STAR GATE was intermittently funded by the U.S. Army, Navy, Air Force, Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) and CIA during the ’70s, ‘80s and ‘90s.

EXPANDED AWARENESS

There was natural skepticism about the program inside the U.S. defense and intelligence communities. The value of research and operational activities was questioned, even though the amount of dollars invested in the project was quite small.

When information about the program became public, some people again questioned the wisdom of the relatively modest expenditures involved. There was speculation that it was yet another example of wasteful Pentagon spending.

However, today we have significant evidence that Project STAR GATE helped uncover a whole new understanding of the human mind and the abilities of perception and awareness that we all have to one degree or another.

The Project STAR GATE teams developed a protocol for using the human mind to gather intelligence. They called it “remote viewing.” They found that people with particularly good natural and/or acquired aptitude in this area could obtain accurate information about persons, places, things and situations at a distance using only their consciousness.

It was not 100 percent accurate – far from it. But enough solid information was obtained in many cases to clearly demonstrate that people can accurately perceive things from afar.

Remote viewing has been compared to the more common feelings we often experience: hunches, gut instincts and intuition.

In the years since Project STAR GATE became public, a much greater awareness of the potential of the human mind has steadily expanded throughout America. Many credible books about remote viewing and Project STAR GATE have been published and read by millions. TV shows and movies have tackled the subject, sometimes with mixed results. Training programs (not all of them reliable) have been available to the general public.

BANG FOR THE BUCK

Project STAR GATE has been the subject of defense-related academic research as well. A graduate-level paper for the Marine Corps War College was written in 2001 by a Navy SEAL officer. The paper was titled “Unconventional Human Intelligence Support: Transcendent and Asymmetric Warfare Implications of Remote Viewing.” The author coined the term “transcendent warfare” to describe the identification and utilization of new and emerging discoveries to enhance success of U.S. defense activities.

In 2010, another graduate-level paper was prepared for the National Defense Intelligence College titled “Anomalous Human Cognition: A Possible Role Within the Crucible of Intelligence Collection.” This research report provided updated perspectives on the roles of expanded human consciousness in national security matters.

Many other reports of various kinds have been written about the Project STAR GATE, remote viewing and anomalous cognition efforts.

One such worthwhile article appeared in the summer 2001 edition of “The Intelligencer,” the Journal of U.S. Intelligence Studies of the Association of Former Intelligence Officers (AFIO). The article, “CIA-Initiated Remote Viewing at Stanford Research Institute” by Project STAR GATE researcher Hal Puthoff, Ph.D. presented a solid overview of the program.

From the modest funding for initial research, the program was able to keep going over the years by way of additional funds that appear to have been very minimal considering the implications and eventual outcomes we see today.

Americans have received tremendous “bang for the buck” from Project STAR GATE.

The idea of transcendent warfare related to remote viewing research seems truly applicable now in efforts to make intelligent use of defense dollars available. Ways in which human consciousness can be used to enhance U.S. defense and American society as a whole sometimes appear to be unlimited.

This return on investment from the early days of Project STAR GATE may not be on the radar of all Americans at this time. However, by taking a good look at these efforts, it seems clear that the smart use of defense monies can be more important than unwise massive expenditures on activities that can sap our national strength rather than enhance it.

‘Dumbed-down’ approaches needed for White House UFO petitions?

By Steve Hammons

(This article also appears on American Chronicle.)

Petitions to the White House asking for the release of more information about unidentified flying objects (UFOs) have stirred up controversy, curiosity and hope for improved public understanding about the UFO phenomena.

Some observers seem to think the petitions are dumb, especially if they associate UFOs with some kinds of intelligent beings from elsewhere.

Another concern is that asking for the truth from politicians is often not successful, no matter what the topic may be.

Additionally, the high classification and secrecy about the subject could be related to legitimate national security and public safety issues. In that case, the situation could be quite sensitive and complex.

Yet, there may be a view that dumbed-down tactics and strategies are needed to make progress on learning more about what is going on behind the scenes with UFOs.

But first, some background about the online petitions: The newly-launched White House petition program called “We the People” allows citizens to create online petitions on the White House website and gather signatures. The petitions cover a broad range of topics.

Previously, if 5,000 signatures were gathered in a certain length of time, the White House would give a formal, official response. Now, 25,000 signatures are required within a narrow time frame.

People and groups curious about UFOs launched such petitions to try to get a response from government officials, or at least get the topic on the radar of the pubic, the news media, elected officials, the defense and intelligence communities, and the scientific community.

SOMETHING FLYING AROUND

The Paradigm Research Group created one petition, gathered the 5,000 signatures and received a response from the White House that seemed inadequate and inaccurate. Now, the same group, headed by Stephen Bassett, is following up with a second petition approaching the subject from a different angle.

A third petition trying to get an intelligent response from the White House was launched by historian and researcher Richard Dolan and TV/movie writer and producer Bryce Zabel. They are also taking a certain approach in how they worded their petition. For more information, go to Dolan and Zabel’s website AfterDisclosure.com.

Dolan and Zabel recently co-authored the book “A.D. After Disclosure” on UFO-related topics. Zabel has been involved in other media projects related to this subject.

One main motivation for these petitions and other efforts seems to be the concern that more understanding about UFOs should be available to, and acquired by the public. Greater understanding would include insight about what various UFOs might be and what impact they have on us.

Unusual objects have been seen and reported over the last few decades, as well as in centuries past. Some objects seem to be hard-shelled craft of some kind. They are sometimes disc-shaped, V-shaped, triangle-shaped or cigar-shaped. They can hover silently, cruise slowly or zip away in the blink of an eye. They have been seen at high and low altitudes as well as on the ground.

Other odd things in the sky appear more like lights or energy of some kind, not necessarily a hard-shelled craft.

Military personnel and pilots, peace officers and thousands of reliable witnesses have seen these kinds of phenomena. High-ranking U.S. and international military and defense officials have, over the decades, stated that these objects are real.

There have been indications that international governments and militaries have long investigated these objects which intrude on nations’ airspace and sometimes seem to pose a risk to air-traffic safety, among other concerns.

Based on documents and other information-gathering, many qualified researchers have concluded that much has been learned about UFOs and the subject is generally handled as a top-secret situation. Research, counterintelligence measures, scientific projects and other activities since the World War II era may have discovered significant amounts of information and insight about UFOs, some researchers indicate.

As a result, many people, including those authoring the White House petitions on the subject, would like to get more information.

AN INTELLIGENT PUBLIC

Challenges facing the petition coordinators include those related to the White House petition process.

The White House website has reportedly experienced glitches or difficulties for petition-signers. Getting 25,000 signatures in a short time frame may prove tough to accomplish.

Other difficulties include the complicated and mysterious nature of the UFO phenomena itself and the security surrounding related defense and intelligence activities on UFOs.

Ridicule of people interested in the subject, or even those who have witnessed such objects, has long discouraged the conversation. And ridicule is still a factor in play by some news commentators, a few scientific writers and even UFO researchers themselves.

And yet another element to consider is that the UFO topic may not simply about one type of visitors from another planet. It could be much more complex and involve many factors that could be truly mind-boggling.

Because of this, it has been theorized that information available to the public about the situation is probably best handled in coordinated, careful and safe ways.

In addition, it may be better if people become informed on this topic by learning about it themselves. This "grassroots-up" awareness may be better than "top-down" information from U.S. government officials.

Will the petitions make progress in raising awareness about the UFO phenomena? Undoubtedly they will to one degree or another. Will the 25,000 signatures be attained? It’s possible but could be a challenge. Will the White House team come up with a better reply than their response to the first petition? We can always hope so.

It may be interesting to see how it all plays out.

But one thing seems probable, the American people and many people internationally may not want dumbed-down approaches or answers about UFOs or the other important more-conventional issues of the day.

And, interestingly, the UFO situation may have direct connections with the many other current developments and challenges the human race faces on Earth today.

US space activities evolving – will efforts help Americans?

By Steve Hammons

(This article also appears on American Chronicle.)

The end of the space shuttle era brings new challenges and opportunities for American activities in space.

The next wave of U.S. spacecraft is under development on many fronts: rockets, the commercial crew-and-cargo capsule CST-100, space planes and expandable orbital space habitats that could someday double as Moon and Mars habitats.

Boeing recently announced that it will lease a former space shuttle hangar at the Kennedy Space Center in Florida to continue work on the CST-100. Hundreds of aerospace and other jobs are expected to be created.

The CST-100s will be built in and launched from Florida’s “Space Coast,” said John Mulholland, a Boeing executive.

These hopeful developments occur in an overall economic downturn that has caused immense suffering by many American families who have lost jobs, seen the value of their homes crushed and in many cases lost their homes.

Many Americans may fairly and honestly ask if investments in the evolving U.S. space activities will give a return on investment.

EXPANDING PROSPERITY

As we know, in past decades most of the U.S. space effort centered in the U.S. government agency NASA, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Now, NASA is working with the commercial aerospace community in an expanded way.

New approaches to doing things are being explored. The government-private partnerships are evolving in attempts to help move the ball forward on U.S. space activities of many kinds.

If done wisely, these efforts may be able to create jobs and reap benefits from advanced technologies and methods. These, in turn, could help contribute to economic prosperity and overall progress for America.

At least that is an optimistic view.

The nuts and bolts of the changing commercial space community involve many companies, groups and organizations. Smaller entrepreneurial outfits are teaming up with established aerospace-related corporations.

Their efforts could bear fruit in ways that can be anticipated, and maybe also in ways that will be surprising.

PUBLIC SUPPORT IMPORTANT

Advanced technologies and knowledge acquired in the aerospace community are certainly impressive. And, we can guess that in terms of national defense aerospace, the developments could be really quite advanced.

How can we merge these elements with the very difficult state of the U.S. economy that is affecting so many of our fellow Americans at a very human level?

If we can find relevant answers, then an increased support for U.S. space activities might result.

In this time of difficult economic choices and challenging developments, the efforts of the aerospace community will undoubtedly move forward to the best of their ability. Getting public understanding and support might enhance this progress.

There also could be a range of new information and concrete benefits coming from aerospace-related leading-edge and forward-leaning research. Some fields could be specific to aerospace efforts and some could be more broadly-based and broadly-applied in ways that help Americans.

Evaluating the merits of robust U.S. space activities will probably continue to be in the eyes of the beholder.

Highly-advanced spacecraft to replace space shuttle?

By Steve Hammons

(This article also appears on American Chronicle.)

As the space shuttle program ends and new commercial spaceflight endeavors accelerate, some people may wonder if there is another major element of U.S. space activities – one that is top secret and the public knows little or nothing about.

Rumors, reports and a bit of natural curiosity make some people wonder if the U.S. may already have spacecraft that are tremendously more advanced than the space shuttle.

Is there a classified and covert space fleet? Are they manned or unmanned? Are special pilots and crews operating in space in advanced, secret craft?

We know that U.S. defense and intelligence requirements include sophisticated satellite systems and that these generally remain behind the scenes. And, there have been defense-oriented shuttle-like space planes.

But do our space activities and spacecraft go beyond this? Beyond the space shuttle and beyond the International Space Station (ISS)?

HELPING AMERICA

Common sense and common consensus tell us that there most likely are advanced technologies being researched, created and used that are decades or even centuries ahead of what most of us think of as state-of-the-art U.S. aircraft-spacecraft development.

We don’t need to consider situations like the so-called Roswell incident, UFOs and extraterrestrial visitation to come to the conclusion that our space program may actually not miss the shuttle that much. Human engineers and scientists are capable of making tremendous progress on their own, thank you very much.

It could be that we are now in a new age of space travel and it may be more interesting than some people think. Technologies and aircraft-spacecraft in the pipeline might be quite astounding.

A recent book about Nevada’s Area 51 aircraft development and test facilities sparked the interest of many readers. The book also generated admiration for the people who have worked on advanced aircraft there and elsewhere.

The efforts of Area 51 personnel and the efforts of others like them should not be underestimated.

A question that might arise in some minds, though, is “Are these advances being used to help America as a whole?”

IN THE PIPELINE

Defense and intelligence applications of advanced technologies are obviously needed to help ensure national security. Yet, wider dissemination of some of these same technologies might help meet some of our current economic and human challenges.

And – back to the expanding commercial spaceflight community – certain technologies probably could be put in a proper pipeline to help the development of this new industry.

What will our space program look like in five or ten years? We may have bases on the moon. We may have missions to Mars. We may be zipping through weird time-space wormholes and star gates to faraway galaxies, surfing quantum energies that we are now learning more about.

But for today, the news media tells us about the space shuttle’s last mission. The ISS is occasionally in the news – as it was recently when the crew had to get to the “lifeboats” when space debris came too near.

How do we understand the gap between what has been and what will be? How will developments in space affect life on Earth? How will humans make the next steps in understanding the Universe and ourselves?

If Roswell was extraterrestrial crash, can more details be released?

By Steve Hammons

(This article also appears on American Chronicle.)

What if the incident in the Roswell, New Mexico, region in the summer of 1947 actually was a crash of an extraterrestrial craft with deceased and live “extraterrestrial biological entities (EBEs)” aboard?

What if it was not a weather balloon and not an experimental high-altitude device with crash dummies inside? What if it was not a Russian psychological operations (PSYOP) plot as an Area 51 scientist says he was told, and is reported in the new book by writer Annie Jacobsen?

There seem to be significant reliable indications of various kinds that the Roswell case is based on a very unusual event that was deemed to be very important at the time and in subsequent decades … up to today.

Does the Roswell incident explain all of the UFO sightings that have been reported over the years? Or, is it just part of the overall situation that could be quite complex?

Is it all good news? Maybe not.

LESSONS LEARNED

Additionally, other research into unusual or anomalous phenomena is not specifically linked to UFOs, but may be related in some way.

These possibly-related kinds of studies include new and different views of space, time, wormholes, star gates, multiple dimensions and other forward-leaning scientific theories that could change our view of reality and Nature.

Edge-science topics such as extrasensory perception (ESP) and theories about an afterlife also might play a part in the overall scenario that could be related to extraterrestrial visitation – or visitation by other anomalous intelligent beings.

The impacts on human society of such new knowledge could be quite valuable, according to some researchers. The development of humanity could be helped quite a bit by accessing advanced knowledge and understanding, they say.

Yet, the dangers of one population interfacing with another technologically-advanced group of beings can have negative consequences, many people have pointed out.

A common example is the way Native American Indians were affected by the arrival of Europeans. The many tribes had their own unique experiences with these strange visitors from faraway. But, in most cases the Indians’ land was taken, their cultures damaged and they were killed directly by the newcomers’ weapons or by European diseases.

Some researchers say this is a lesson we should learn well when thinking about extraterrestrial visitors.

MAJIC MOMENTS

Many qualified researchers seem to be trying to find out more about these kinds of leading-edge subjects. They report their findings in books, TV shows and other communications platforms. These all probably contribute to our understanding in one way or another – though figuring out what is true can be challenging.

Fantastic stories in movies and fictional works also can contain very helpful information that advances our orientation and acclimation about unconventional situations. They can help our situational awareness.

The new movie project Majic Men about the Roswell case looks like it will also be informative and fun. The tentative title is based on the rumor that “MAJIC” was shorthand for a group and was also a security category for U.S. government activities handling the extraterrestrial situation.

Majic Men may join the ranks of other successful movies and media projects about aliens, edge-science and anomalous phenomena. Maybe audiences are attracted to such works because people sense that there is some good open-source intelligence (OSINT) to be had – maybe even intelligence information that can benefit them and their loved ones directly and personally.

There seem to be indications that human consciousness and the understanding of it are making progress. If significant progress can be made in these fields, then it is theorized that many other areas of life on Earth (and maybe elsewhere) can also be improved significantly.

Steady progress and safe release of information on certain subjects are probably good ways to proceed. That said, a breakthrough once in a while might also be helpful and inspiring.

Maybe the recent media and public attention to the alleged Roswell incident in the context of other factors will contribute to such a breakthrough in human consciousness.

'Inside sources’ say Roswell was extraterrestrial crash

By Steve Hammons

(This article also appears on American Chronicle.)

The so-called “Roswell incident” has been in the media recently due to a new book about Area 51 by writer Annie Jacobsen. In her book yet another version of the story has been put forward, this one even stranger than some of the others – if that is possible.

However, the often-told and widely-known story about a crash of an extraterrestrial craft near Roswell in the summer of 1947 keeps surfacing.

In April 2011 a researcher who claims to be in contact with well-placed former and current officials in the U.S. Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) released an alleged statement from his DIA sources related to Roswell.

The report was identified as “Release 35” and was the latest of many such information “releases” posted on the website serpo.org. The series of releases began in November 2005.

This new information about the Roswell case seems to support the overall view of the situation as depicted in certain reliable investigative research as well as in some movies, TV shows and other media.

CRASH SITES

Below is what the anonymous source had to tell the researcher, according to the “Release 35” information posted on serpo.org:

“Here is the correct information regarding the reported two or three crashed alien craft and sites,” the alleged DIA source reportedly claims.

“In 1950, the FBI Foreign Counterintelligence (FCI) was investigating the UFO phenomenon. The FBI received a classified briefing from USAF Intelligence in 1950.”

“During the briefing, the USAF reported that there might have been three flying saucer crashes in New Mexico. U.S. Army/Air Force found three possible crash sites in NM.”

“One site was located approximately 40 miles north of Roswell.”

“One site was located approximately 10 miles southeast of Corona.”

“And one site was near Shaw Mountain, south of the Plains of San Agustin in western NM. The latter site was found in 1949 by some ranchers,” the anonymous source reportedly states.

“The first two sites were believed to be two different craft, however, the USAF later determined that the site north of Roswell and southeast of Corona were the same craft, which broke up into two distinct pieces.”

“In 1947, another piece of the Roswell craft was found by a rancher east of Corona, along State Route 247.”

The alleged anonymous source reportedly goes on to state, “As I have said for many years, there has not been a single book written that tells the true, real story of Roswell nor the other crash site in western New Mexico.”

"’Flying saucer’ researchers have ignored the real information and relied on outright false or faulty information given by second and third person witnesses.”

BODIES FOUND

According to the “Release 35” report on serpo.org, the anonymous source told the researcher more details about the alleged crash at Roswell:

“In 1957, the USAF published a highly classified report that fully detailed all of the crash sites in New Mexico.”

“The report lists one crash site for the Roswell craft, but two two different debris fields.”

“One being where part of the craft landed north of Roswell and the second being southeast of Corona.”

“The second crash site was listed as Shaw Mountain. Alien bodies were recovered at both crash sites.”

“The USAF theorized that both crafts collided in midair north of Roswell.”

The source goes on to explain the results of this alleged midair crash: “One craft broke up with one piece landing north of Roswell and the other piece landing southeast of Corona.”

“The second craft made it west to the area just north of Shaw Mountain where it crashed.”

“The first alien craft was found a few days later, but the second site wasn't found until 1949.”

“The alien bodies found in the second craft were highly decomposed.”

“The first alien crashed craft was taken to Roswell and later on to Wright Air Field in Ohio.”

“The second alien craft was taken to Kirtland Field, Albuquerque, where it was carefully examined. It was later taken to Los Alamos Labs where it was subjected to a thorough, highly detailed examination.”

“The USAF were able to compare both pieces of the craft from Roswell and Corona and determined it was just one craft. Later, they used the piece found in 1957 to fully reconstruct the alien craft.”

“The second alien craft was heavily damaged, but was in one piece,except for small fragments that landed within one mile of the crash site.”

“Although heavily decomposed, the USAF and the Armed Forces Institute of Pathology were able to determine that both sets of remains were from the same alien species. There were classified as non-humans, but were air breathing life forms.”

CRASH DATE

A second anonymous source, also reported to be associated with the DIA, is also quoted in “Release 35.” He addresses the researcher’s question about the date of the Roswell crash.

“That is conjecture on the part of the entire intelligence community. Col John Merritt, former chief at AF intel back in the old days – and now long since deceased – was convinced the crash occurred on Saturday, June 14, 1947. That is what many of the early filed reports stated,” the source is quoted as stating.

“However, in the mid-'90s, a team of Los Alamos scientists determined the crash date to be around Thursday, June 12 - Tuesday, July 1, 1947. I tend to agree with those dates. There are many factors involved.”

“Marcel stated it was about Tuesday, June 24, 1947, but then changed that date several times during later interviews.” [Jesse Marcel was the Army Air Forces intelligence officer at the Roswell base.]

“One factor you must remember is that EBE-1 [extraterrestrial biological entity] was alive and found in pretty good shape by the first U.S. Army recovery team at the site where the craft was found. That site was different than what Marcel and Brazel found [rancher Mac Brazel].They found the debris field. The craft was about one mile away.”

“Although it has been years since I had access to that information, I can say this: Based on all of the field reports, the approximate crash date for the Roswell sites was stated as Thursday, June 12 – Tuesday, July 1, 1947. That is based on several factors with the primary ones being radar profiles recorded by the U.S. Army in New Mexico.”

These alleged accounts from anonymous sources may be interesting to some people, yet others will discount them as probable fantasy, disinformation or simply more rumors.

It seems clear that the Roswell case still holds the interest of many people and all the details – whatever they may be – have probably not yet surfaced.

Troops in the afterlife: Special perspectives, new missions

By Steve Hammons

(This article also appears on American Chronicle.)

Some recent research into near death experiences (NDEs) has noted that U.S. troops in current combat zones who experienced a group trauma of injuries and death might also experience group NDEs.

In other words, if a team of soldiers was attacked using an improvised explosive device (IED) for example, injuring some and killing others, they could have a shared experience of moving from their bodies in the classic NDE as they proceed as a group toward the rumored tunnel of light, a portal to the afterlife.

Those injured troops who might eventually survive the attack could go part way with their buddies, then say goodbye and return to face urgent medical treatment.

If reports and research into NDEs and the afterlife have any truth to them, we might wonder what our fallen warriors now think about their lives, their loved ones and their sacrifice.

Do they have new insights and useful perspectives about the reasons they went to Iraq, Afghanistan, Vietnam, Korea, World War II, World War I, the Civil War, the Revolutionary War, the Native American Indian wars and the many other battles large and small throughout American and human history?

Can they teach us anything? Are we able to hear them?

ANOTHER OPERATIONAL ENVIRONMENT

Although many faiths tell us that an afterlife exists in some other dimension of space and time, many people have their doubts. Proving the existence of a place we might call Heaven or some other name is apparently quite difficult using current scientific methods.

Yet, many studies of people who have experienced severe injury or illness and who report an afterlife-type encounter have been conducted using reasonable scientific protocols to the degree possible.

Particularly interesting and potentially valid are the reports of ill or injured young children who have not been indoctrinated into religious or philosophical beliefs, nor exposed to literature or media portrayals of an afterlife.

Many of these children have reported going to a beautiful place filled with light, love and happiness before they return to their families on Earth.

Military personnel who might experience the same journey would seem to be in a different position to evaluate such a situation that they also go through. What is their “situational awareness” as they realize they have been killed?

Are they alone or with some of their platoon members, shipmates or aircraft crewmates as they lift out of and above their bodies, then find themselves moving toward a strange and beautiful light?

Do they have communication among themselves as they transition from being in a combat mode to the acceptance that they are now in a new operational environment?

We might imagine that their military training and experiences could be useful as they use reconnaissance and intelligence perspectives in the reportedly brief trip to another dimension.

Maybe other fallen veterans greet them upon their arrival. Or, maybe a favorite grandmother and grandfather who passed on years ago are waiting to welcome them.

ONGOING COVERT MISSIONS

On this Memorial Day, it seems reasonable to consider the possibility that our troops who have passed on may still be with us, though in a place that is both far away and very close at hand.

Somehow, it is difficult to see former Marines and other U.S. troops sitting around playing harps. These are beings who take bold action and have outstanding courage. They want to tackle worthwhile goals and accomplish them successfully.

Do they have current ongoing training and missions? If so, what might those entail? They may involve somewhat covert operations that we can only guess about. They could be related to tactics and strategies to further win the peace and establish a lasting victory of some kind.

Wouldn’t it be interesting if clandestine insertions by Heavenly recon teams are taking place now to prepare the way for a more major operation – some kind of beach landing or airborne arrival to liberate us in fantastic and amazing ways?

Maybe there are there other discreet and covert activities “behind the lines” to help prepare the way for such a liberation. Appropriate security measures could be in place to help ensure victory.

This Memorial Day, perhaps we can view the bigger picture of human conflict and development, and see things in a new light.

Maybe we can not only honor our warriors who have passed on, but also prepare to meet them again.